Welcome, visitor! Register

The Direct Selling Association on Pyramid Schemes: Truth and Truthiness

MLM News November 5, 2015

The Direct Selling Association on Pyramid Schemes: Truth and Truthiness
Rate this post

Dr Vander Nat and Dr Keep set the record straight & discuss how recent DSA report mainly appeals to truthiness, takes novel stand on key diagnostic for a pyramid scheme and runs contrary to recent case law

This is a guest blog by Peter Vander Nat, Ph D, and William Keep, Ph D. Dr Vander Nat is a former senior economist with the FTC who has testified in numerous federal pyramid scheme cases. Dr Keep is the Dean of the School of Business at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ) and an expert on pyramid schemes. Together Drs Vander Nat and Keep authored two seminal works analyzing the MLM industry

Public statements presented as true, though without supporting logic or evidence, if repeated frequently and with enough gravitas may eventually be accepted as true. To capture this type of phenomenon, a new word has been added to our lexicon, “truthiness.” Truthiness does not necessarily indicate a false statement, though a false statement authoritatively asserted as though it were true does qualify.

Below we test our understanding of truthiness with regard to a recent report commissioned by the Direct Selling Association (DSA) and other assorted DSA public statements. Curiously, the authors of the DSA report are antitrust experts, who have neither published any scholarly works concerning multilevel marketing companies (MLMs), nor acted as pyramid scheme experts in a court of law. Perhaps it is due to this lack of expertise and experience that their report mainly appeals to truthiness.

As for truth, it is certainly true that much effort, time and many words went into criticizing a paper* that we wrote thirteen years ago. But it must be pointed out at the start that the model we developed as a scholarly work has never been used in a court of law to determine whether or not a company is operating a pyramid scheme, and it was never proposed that it could function in that way. This is so because each pyramid case presents a unique set of available data, and the analysis in each case must address how the company functions in practice. Unfortunately, the authors of the DSA report did not appreciate these relevant points. If they had, their report could have been cut in half, and perhaps more.

The DSA report grants at the start that we are recognized experts in the field of distinguishing a legitimate business enterprise from a pyramid scheme. But it omits the recognition that, in the 15 pyramid scheme cases in which Dr. Vander Nat was appointed the government’s expert – each time submitting an economic analysis to the court — no court has ever rejected his conclusion that the organization is/was a pyramid scheme. That is to say, the vast majority of arguments made in the DSA report are old news, having been considered and either rejected or ignored in numerous courts of law.

Unencumbered by this precedent, the DSA report takes a novel stand and boldly declares (literally puts in bold), “[t]he key diagnostic for a pyramid scheme is whether the transactions defining the commercial enterprise yield incremental value to society,” — a claim that is firmly rejected by eminent scholarship in law and economics (see Posner below). Here is a respectful word of advice to DSA members: although you might like what this report has to say, if ever an MLM company is in court defending itself against pyramid scheme allegations, waxing poetic about the firm’s value to society won’t help; far better to focus on retail sales.

We further highlight that the 2014 BurnLounge decision, which is used as the basis for the DSA’s critique of our work, does not invalidate our emphasis on retail sales, whether in the 2002 paper or in specific court testimony (below). By presenting a few selective portions of the BurnLounge ruling and ignoring the fully articulated basis for the ruling that BurnLounge was a pyramid scheme, the DSA report dismisses our emphasis on retail sales as “a premise that cannot be sustained.” Actually, we show the opposite. Not only can it be sustained, an emphasis on retail sales is being sustained by the appellate decision itself (2014) and in a recent federal court injunction against Vemma (2015).

Read More:
<img src=”https://mlmnewsblog.com/2015/11/the-direct-selling-association-on-pyramid-schemes-truth-and-truthiness/”1″ width=”1″ alt=””>

top-5-australian-business-directories-free-listing

No Tags

269 total views, 1 today

  

Sponsored Links

Leave a Reply

  • PACL - आज आ सकता है निवेशकों के दो करोड़ रुपए का फैसला

    by on March 11, 2015 - 59 Comments

    PACL – आज आ सकता है निवेशकों के दो करोड़ रुपए का फैसला5 (100%) 2 votes मध्य प्रदेश/रतलाम। PACL में फंसे निवेशकों की राशि पर फैसला बुधवार को आने की संभावना है। सेट यदि कंपनी को रुपए लौटाने का आदेश देता है तो एक साल बाद निवेशकों को पैसा मिलेगा। कंपनी आरडी, एफडी सहित अन्य […]

  • KWIL कंपनी ने उगाहे झारखंड से 300 करोड़

    by on February 17, 2015 - 13 Comments

    KWIL कंपनी ने उगाहे झारखंड से 300 करोड़Rate this post कोलकाता: Kolkata Weir Industries Limited नाम की चिटफंड कंपनी पर पांच वर्षो में झारखंड से 300 करोड़ रुपये की उगाही कर गायब होने का आरोप है.  इस चिटफंड कंपनी के एजेंट तमाल कुमार जाना ने बताया : झारखंड में कंपनी ने 2009 में अपना व्यवसाय शुरू किया […]

  • The Direct Selling Association – No Backbone When You Are Under Sieg

    by on September 3, 2015 - 0 Comments

    The Direct Selling Association – No Backbone When You Are Under SiegRate this post The Direct Selling Association – No Backbone When You Are Under Sieg   According to the Direct Selling Organisation (DSA) website: “DSA’s services to members are designed to meet the needs of one person critical to the industry’s growth and future […]

  • VISHWAMITRA INDIA और SAI PRASAD पर हुई छापेमारी, 24 गिरफ्तार

    by on May 1, 2015 - 0 Comments

    VISHWAMITRA INDIA और SAI PRASAD पर हुई छापेमारी, 24 गिरफ्तारRate this post झारखंड /जमशेदपुर – चिटफंड कंपनियों पर नकेल कसने के लिए झारखंड उच्च न्यायालय की फटकार के बाद सरकारी मशीनरी हरकत में आ गई है. रांची जिला प्रशासन ने गुरुवार को दो चिटफंड कंपनियों के विरुद्ध अभियान चलाया.  पुलिस ने गुरुवार को राजधानी में […]

  • Talk Fusion Anticipates Record-Breaking Dream Getaway

    by on September 30, 2015 - 0 Comments

    Talk Fusion Anticipates Record-Breaking Dream GetawayRate this post Talk Fusion Anticipates Record-Breaking Dream Getaway   With only 6 weeks left in the qualification period, Talk Fusion is already expecting attendance to break all previous records for their 6th Dream Getaway vacation incentive from December 3-7, 2015. Talk Fusion rewards qualified Associates from across the globe […]

Subscribe to News via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 24 other subscribers